পাতা:বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ দলিলপত্র (দ্বাদশ খণ্ড).pdf/৪২৬

এই পাতাটির মুদ্রণ সংশোধন করা হয়েছে, কিন্তু বৈধকরণ করা হয়নি।
বাংরাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ দলিলপত্রঃ দ্বাদশ খণ্ড
৪০০
শিরোনাম সূত্র তারিখ
সারভেণ্টস অফ ইণ্ডয়া সোসাইটির সভাপতি কর্তৃক রাষ্ট্রসংঘের ভূমিকার সমালোচনা পাকিস্তান ১৪ জুন, ১৯৭১

KUNZRU ASSALIS U.N.’S

Lukewarm stand on E. Bengal DP problem

“The Time of India” News Service”

 POONA, June 13- Dr, K. M KUNZRU, President of the Servants of India Society Yesterday called for “serious thought” on “our course of action” if conditions were not created by Pakistan for security and safe return of the others of refugees to their homes in East Bengal.

 No one would like a crisis to arise, but if it did in spite of the restrain returned by India “we should be fully prepared to meet it” he added. He was delivering the annual public address on the funder’s day of the………

 Dr. Kunzru made a scathing criticism of the United Nations. Particularly the United States, for their “incredulouness” in the beginning and the lukewarm, attitude now towards the refugee problem.

 He pointed out how in spite of the belated appeal by the U. N Secretary General, “no substantial” international aid for the relief of the refugees had been received so far.

 He contrasted this with the Hungarian crisis of 1956 and said that when. he “Hungarian freedom fighters” had to leave their country both the U.N and America were anxious to relieve their distress. But provision for relief by them for East Pakistani refugees was ‘extremely inadequate’ a slow in coming.

 East Bengal had been a victim of one of the most ruthless massacres known to history” The west Pakistani troops had committed “brutal atrocities to destroy the political and intellectual leadership, exterminate the minority community or drive it out of East Bengal and terrorize the whole population,” he said.

ARMS SUPPLY

 He said the tragedy had been treated as an internal affair of Pakistan by England and America as if the gross violation of human right was not their concern and that of the U.N.

 America, which was the “main source” of arms supply to Pakistan, had not expressed its strong disapproval of the brutalities committed by the west Pakistani troops in Bangladesh. Nor had it stopped the supply of spare parts to Pakistani armed forces of its economic aid to that country.

 Dr. Kunzru pointed out that the conflict in East Bengal had long ceased to be an internal affair of Pakistan.