পাতা:বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ দলিলপত্র (দ্বাদশ খণ্ড).pdf/৬৭১

এই পাতাটির মুদ্রণ সংশোধন করা প্রয়োজন।

ყ,8(* বাংরাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ দলিলপত্রঃ দ্বাদশ খন্ড problem, with these refugees. The Government of India was saying at first that they would go back within three months. Now they have extended the time to six months. Perhaps they will come forward with another extension of time for more than one year. It is not a question of six months, it is a question of how you deal with it. If you are convinced that until and unless there is political solution, until and unless there is a non-communal Government and the people's desire is given effect to by the popular Government these refugees will not go back, what are you doing to get that situation created in Bangladesh? That is my question. And I have failed to get reply to this question as to what the Government of India is going to do to get a climate created in Bangladesh in which these people can go back. The foreign Minister has expressed the hope that these refugees will go back if favorable circumstances are created and normalcy is restored. But who is coming to your help? Who is taking your brief? What are the international organizations doing? (Time bell rings) I am finishing. The United Nations is trying to pose it as a matter between India and Pakistan. It is trying to send observer to both India and Pakistan. What business has the United Nations to send observers here? What was U Thant, the Secretary-General of United Nations, doing when genocide was taking place, when foreign delegations reported on it when the Labor Party leader in House of Commons in the Untied Kingdom described it as one of the most tragic happenings of this century, when the Canadian delegation said that there was hardly any precedent for such blood curdling atrocities committed on the civilian population by the military administration in Pakistan? What was U Thant doing then? Why didn't he convene the general Assembly within 24 hours? If after the nationalization of Suez Canal, if after the developments in Lebanon in 1958, the U.N. General Assembly could meet within 24 hours, why did not the General Assembly meet in this case? Why did not the General assembly meet to pass a resolution condemning the barbarous atrocities of Pakistan? (Time bell rings) Sir, I know my time is limited. I am going to finish. I want to request the honorable Foreign Minister again, let not the policy of the Government of India be limited, let not the policy of the Government of India be delayed, let the Government of India speak here and now in unmistakable terms, in unambiguous terms that we are committed to the people of Bangladesh, not only in the interests of the liberation forces, but in the interests of ourselves. With these words, Sir, I conclude. Thank you. The question was proposed. SHRISITARAM KESRI (Bihar): Sir, I move: 1. "That in the Resolution for the words, to establish diplomatic relations with it and to make a declaration to that effect before the conclusion of the current session of of Parliament, the words, 'at the appropriate time' be substituted." SHRI J. P. YADAV (Bihar); Sir, I move: 3. "That in the Resolution