VYAWASTH Ă-IDARI'AN A. si ti a
- ...turn. He that is so adopted indeed remains, while he lives, in the gotra of his adoptive father : Łut his son returns to his original one, Deseribing the aniya-datta, Jodyáraný quote the following text from the Virnaya-vindhu : “That son, to whom the preseribed ceremonies have won terformed in the go/rol of his natural father, as far as the tonsure, does not possess the fall qualities of a son: he is a temporary son only” ( initya-dutta. J The author quotes one of the rachanas of Satyńskálha, which states the aniya-puttro to be equivalent to the dityámushuiyans, or son of two fathers; and hence it follows, that he is to perform the funeral ceremonies of both
! thers, the natural and the adoptive. The result is that hitya-datsa is a son adopted from the same gotra, before or after the remony of the tonsure; or a son adopted from a different outrit before the tonsure , tuitya-da!!. a son adopted from a different gotra, after he has received the tonsure in his natural outra. The performance of the tonsure is the cause of the temporary nature of the latter species of adop‘ion.—Remarks by Mr. Ellis. See Str. H. L. vol. II. pp. 97, S. 541. One boy, who is not a brother's son, can he adopted, whether as an absolute dati, kıt or as a dutyáu, nishyáy tua, only by oue man,—not by two or inore." “Iy a man lestitute of a son.”—From the singular number being here used, it follow, 'hat the sam' son must not he adopted by two or three persons.—But would not the law, as to !h, on given, and the rest being rfiryámitshyâya nas, ( or sons of two fathtr*, ) he thus vontra'it':ed ? Not so; for, the state as son of two fathers imports both a natural and an adoptivo father, and the prohibition regards two adoptive fathers. Thus there is no contradiction.— . Mlim. Seet. I. § 30–32. 542. A whole brother's son may be adopted in the dor/simush'ssistma form hy نه اسپه. two or more unck's.” As ‘they' is a compound, formed by the retention of one term and omission of others, Hong ... solvable into the phrase “he and they (duul and plural);” at the desire of one two or mor,
- Two persons canno i to in the adoption of one sam.–Maen. H. L. v. l. s. p. 77. The same person eannat le ad pted by more than one individual, except in the eas - eine noqshow,
serral uncles, the who brothers of his natural father.--Sutherland's Synodois, Head Second, § 4. Thus, though a youth may in this way have two fathers, he cannot have two adoptive ones ; sino same on cannot be adopted by more persons than one, excepting as hot won a sit'; how, and Feveral stol, s , nor, in this case, is it clear that it can be always practicalle-Str. H. s. vol. I, pp. 74, 75. r, با فاقد ه ق و ۹۲۹ ، ، ، ، ، Sir Willian Maynaghten 8ays ..-. Tw( persons cannot join in the adoption of онекои. А поtion sсене o, i.ave prevailed, that two brothers night adopt the ht this is entirely f*fr{}{4 t} : j , . 'o supposition sers to have proceeded on a miseonstructiori of the f litrwing text of Manu:-—* í ;. one overal brothers of the whole blood, one have a son boro, Manu pronounces them all fathers of a alie hill by means of that son.” But that text is not meant to authorise the adoption of a stophew won v two or more brothers. The adopted Kon of one brother would of course offer up oilation, to sh **-tors of all, and so far would perform the office of a son to them also ; but he would not take the coat. his adopting father's brothers, in the event of their having any nearer heir. (Maen. H. L. vol.J. p 77 )—And for authority he refers to the following passage of his father's Considerations on the Hindú
- ,
70 ز : ، ، ب \ \ ، ، ، ، ، ، ، \ , , A, 1 }, , , , !
