vyAvASTHADARPANA. ፱ ፅ4{) ..?: family and estate of his adoptive father is a true ground of claim, since he may assert the right of offering a funeral cake to his parent. It follows, that the son given claims the family and estate of his adoptive father. The same remark is made by Regissandess, in the Udráka-tattws: it appears that the son given shall claim the family and estate of his adoptive father alone, since he cannot assume the family name and estate of his natural parent, nor perform his obsequies, which are signified by the terms “funeral cake” and “funeral oblation.” Raghunandana explains the word ‘Swadhá, an oblation to be eaten by progenitors; thus, of him who has given away his son, that is, of the natural father, for this is the nearest term, the funeral cake, or oblation to be eaten by progenitors, in extinct; it follows of course, that the funeral cake shall be offered to the adoptive father.—Coleb. Dig. vol. III. p. 268. III. Consequently, he who is adopted as a son given, has a right to possess the inheritance and perform oboluies, although there be another nephew. He becomes the son of the adopter, under the rule of Wishnu : “He is son of him to whom he is given by his father and mother.”Coleb, Dig. vol. III, p. 267. 587. The rights of a boy adopted by a woman, with the permission of her late husband, are like those of a posthumous son.” So that, 斜 588. Even before his adoption, a gift or other disposition of his to-be father's property will not be valid unless made under circumstances of inevitable necessity, or for the good of the adopted.” 589. Until his adoption and attaining majority, his adoptive mother, as his next friend and guardian, is, however, entitled to take, look after, and take care of, the property, and enjoy it with moderation."
- Abyadopted by viog it & Prmido ' ಹೀthwn hall the right of gothumous son, so that a sale made by her to the prejudice of her late husband's property, even before the adoption, will not be valid, unless made under circumstances of inevitable necessity–Maca. H. L. Vol. I. p. 70 -
Should it have devolved upon a widow to adopt, her husband's estate descending to her on his death, adoption subsequent divest, her succession, like the case of a posthumous child-strange's H. L. vol. H. pp. 88, 80. : (Q.) The plaintiff having been adopted by a woman, had she, su , the same dominion over her property that she had before, so that a mortgage of shouse by her after would be good f (A.) The mortgage under these circumstances would not be good to the projudice of the adopted, if rightly adopted. - - .. Presuming the property here spoken of as the womaa's to have been what devolved upon her by the 88 Wyasaethú,
