পাতা:ব্যবস্থা-দর্পণঃ প্রথম খণ্ড.djvu/৪৪৫

VYAWASTHACDARPAÑA 828 166. Their childless wives who preserve chastity, must be supplied with food and apparel; but disloyal and traitorous wives shall be banished from the habitation. JA GNYAvai.KYA. Since it is directed that daughters must be supported so long as they be not disposed of in marriage, it appears that the expence of nuptials must be defrayed, and that if no share be received by a son; but if the son do take a share, his sister must be supported, and her nuptials defrayed by him alone, as (is done in common cases) by a son whose father is dead. He alone must likewise support his own father (who is disqualified). The legislator mentions “childless wives,” alluding to the married wives of the eunuchs and the rest. So the Ratnākara. Twice married women, and other adulterous wives, however they become so, shall not be supported. “Traitorous wives"—This term, according to the Ratmákara, positively denotes treason, such as the attempt to administer poison or the like, not merely a contentious spirit, consequently the same married wife who ought to be banished from the habitation by her husband, shall in like manner be expelled by his brothers and the rest. Dig. Vol. III. p. 324. عة ب Q. There were two brothers, the elder of whom had a son, who died during his father's lifetime, leaving a widow and two daughters. In this case, on the death of the elder brother, is his son's widow, or his brother's sons, his brother being dead, entitled to inherit from him P If the former, as on her demise there were two sons and two daughters of a daughter, and a son of another daughter living, which of these survivors are entitled to the property which devolved on the widow by right of inheritance P R. The elder brother having died leaving no heir down to the brother, his brother's sons are equally entitled to the succession, but not his son's widow, as the son died defore him. Authorities :—WIslinu. See W. D. p. 29. The brothers' sons having succeedcd to their uncle, will provide his son's widow with the proper maintonance. Zillah Hooghly, May 22nd, 1821. Mae. H. L. Vol. II. Chap. I. Sec. VIII. Case 2. (p. 105.) - Q. B, son of A, having died during the lifetime of his father, will his widow take any share in his property, or in that of C and D, his full brothers, who died after their father P R. If A had three sons, B, C, and D, of whom B died without issue, leaving a widow, and if after this A died, leaving heirs, his two remaining sons him surviving, the right of B to the property left by A is barred by reason of his having died during his father's lifetime. His widow therefore is not entitled to any share in the property of her deceased husband's father. She is entitled to receive maintenance, therefore, and to take by inheritance, during her life, any property of which her husband had possession during his life. Maen. II. L. Vol. II. Chap. 1. Sec. VIII. Case 4. (p. 106) Q. A person turned his wife out of his house, whereupon she went and lived in the family of her own brother, and now claims her maintenance from her husband. In this case, can she, according to law, sue for the means of support P The widow of a 蠶 is excluded by a brothersk sous, but she must be maintained by them.