পাতা:ব্যবস্থা-দর্পণঃ প্রথম খণ্ড.djvu/৬১৫

VYAWAğt'EHA*IDARPANA. 49s as directed by Washisarma (in the gastrof pregnin*widows, ante p. ?). But. should a daughter be produced from that conception, the share (which had been set apart) shall be subsequently distributed among those (brothers).” ; g - 199 But, if the father himself, though apprised of the pregnancy, have given shares to his sons, in virtue of his power. as owner ; the child in the womb has no right to participate, since their property in those shares is complete: he has a right only to the father's allotment; and, if there be a son begotten after the partition, he is entitled to partake equally with him.” - This is applicable only to the case of wealth acquired by the sather.” 190 But, if property inherited from the grandfather, as land or the like (p), had been divided, he may take a share of such property from his brothers.” For partition of it is authorized (only) when the mother becomes incapable of bearing more children” “Sons, with whom the father has made a partition, should give a share to the son born after the distribution”.” Wish Nu. - Since it disagrees with the ordinance (of MANu and Na’aada) that ‘he shall alone take the Taternal wealth, it must relate to the heriditary property, for the reason above mentioned t. (p) The term ‘land and the like comprehends corródy and bipeds. SRI kmshna's Comment on the Dayabhaga. Sans. p. 149. 191 Consequently since the partition is illegal, having been made in other circustances, it ought to be annulled. Surkalsiuna's Colument on the Daya uhaga, 'Sans. 148. A question may be herë propsed for disqhisition: if a man surviving his resignation of worldly concerns, and urged by his fate, co-habit with his wife and beget a son after his property has been divided among his children, what would be the consequence? It is answered: the father's !... *¿Caleb. Dar: bha, pp. f88;139. w. Daí kra. sang. pp. 89, 90. Coleb. Dig. vol. III. pp. 434-- 440. Sai'rnishna's Comiiientary on the Dóyábhåga pp. 147, 148. t; ot. “For the reason above thentionedo)--That which was stated; because the distribution is authorised * the mother becomes incapable, &c. Therefore whether pregnancy were known or not, the partitio being illegal, which has been made, of the grandfather's estate, without the mother's 醬 O bearing children, it ought be annullodi, and the two cited passages will relate to the distribution of such prόρεϊν ι' ಕಿನ್ತಿ। ႏိုင္တူ texts of Mawu afid “the fêst regard the father's own acquired wealth. The contrary must not be supposed. Fiskaishna's commentary on the Doosabkaga, Sans, p. 149. Vyawaatha” Wyävasthá Authority Wyawarthá