পাতা:ব্যবস্থা-দর্পণঃ প্রথম খণ্ড.djvu/৬৭

DIGESTED INDEX VII. e 曝》 _ _ _ - Page 20 The childless chaste widow, living in the ஆ of her husband and restraining herself, will enjoy the estate of her husband until her death ; after her, the heirs of her husband will take it. ... ... ... ... ... ... • - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . ... 55 Sir William Macnaghten's remark on the policy of such vyavasthsá. ... ... ... ... ... 55 A contrary opinion of Viviidabhangārnava refuted. • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 55 I. Mahodā and Brindăban versus Kalyāni and others. 14th March 1803. S. D. A. R. Vol. I. II. Nanda Kumār and another versus Rājendra Nārāyan. 2nd December 1808. S. D. A. R. Vol. II I. Káli Kánta Láhuri versus Golokchamdra Choudhuri. 80th October 1849. 8. D. A. R. pp. 405–41Q. S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S CS S S S S S S S ...87–91 21 If it be impracticable for the widow to stay in the family of her husband, because of opression and other unjust cause, she may betake herself to the family of her father and the rest, provided that her change of residence be not for unchaste purposes... 57 I. Ulná Debi and others versus Krishnamani Debi. 29th July 1846. S. D. A. R. Vol. VII. pp. 270–272. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... --- ... ... ... 75 II. Káshí Náth Basák and Ramá Náth Basák veřsus IIarasundarí Dásí and Kamalmani Dásí.S. C. 11th August 1819. East's notes No. 124. P. C. Clarke's Reports p. 91—101. 117–135 III. Jadumani Dási versus Khyettramoham Shil. S. C. 21 July 1854. ... .. . ... ... 335 22 As the heir of the former (male) owner succeeds to the ႏိုင္ဆိုႏွစ္တို႔ of an inheritrix, the word patná intends the female (whoever she be) entitled to inherit. ... ... ... 55 Nafar Mittra and another versus Rám Kumár Cháturjyå and orthers. 26th May 1828. S. D. A. R. Vol. IV. p. 810. ... ... ... ... - - --- . . . . . . . . . ... ... ... 185 See–Káshí Náth Basák and Ramá Náth Basák versus Harasundarí Dásí & Kamalmani Dásí. 123 23 For women the heritage of their husbands is applicable to use, they must not on any account make waste of their husband's property. ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... , 59 24. Even use should not be by wearing delicate apparel and enjoying similar luxuries: but the widow is authorized to use her husband's property sufficient for the pre servation of her life. ... . 59 25 If unable to subsist otherwise, he is authorised to mortgage her husband's property, if still unable, she may also sell it. S S S S S S S S S S S S S S C C S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 59 26 A gift or other alienation is also permitted for performance of the husband's funeral rites or for the benefit of his soul. e a e - - - e o s 9 s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 I. Bishwa Nāth Datta versus Durgā Prasād Rāy and Shib Chandra Rāy. S. C. 4th July 1815, East's Notes No. 84. . . . . - - * * ... ... ... ... ... ... 75–79 II. Kálikénta Láhuri versus Golokchandra Choudhurf. 80th October 1840. S. D. A. R. pp. 405–410. 總 @ ● 娜 - - - - - - 曾 曾 - - ↔ ■ @ 象 • . • . ● ● - - • *. ... 87–91 III. K£shf Náth Basáek and Ramâ Náth Basák versus Harasundari Dási and Kamalmani Dgsí S. C. East's Notes No. 124 P. C. Clarke's Reports pp. 91—101. . . . . . . . . 117–135 IV. Rám Chundra Sarmá versus Gangá Gobinda. 1st February 1826. S. D. A. R. Vol. IV. р. 117. e - * - - - _ _ e - - - - 91–93 27 A sale or other alienation by the widow is valid when made for liquidation of her husband's debts, for the marriage of his daughters, or for the support of such relatives as it is incumbent to support, likewise to defray the expences of such other acts as are beneficial, and necessary to be performed. ... ... ... ... .. 61 I. Musst. Um Choudhuráni and Gopi Náth Ráy versus Indramani Choudhuráni. S. D. A. LLS 0LL LLL 0000S AAAA S S S S AAS AAAAS AAAAAS S 00S00 II. Babu Harish Chrandra Rāy versus Gobindachandra Datta, And Răni Annapūrnā and others versus Gobinda Chandra Datta. S. D. A. R. 18th April. 1852 ... ... ... 81–83 III. Rani Krishnamaniversus Raj Udwanta Singh and another. 14th June 1828. S. D. A. R. Vol. III. p. 228. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • _ • • • • • • • • • _ ... • • • • • • • • • . •.. ... IV. ੇ Majumdār versus Tārāmani and another. 18th December 1811. S. D. A. R. 8 V. k; Láhuri versus Golok Chandra Choudhurf. S. D. A. R. 30th October 1849.... 87-9l 83 Vyavasthá Precedents 3y כל Vyavasthá Precedents לג 33 Vyawasthá 1'recedent, Vyavasthá zy 23 Precedents גל על לל Wyawasthá Precedents לל P3 23