পাতা:ব্যবস্থা-দর্পণঃ প্রথম খণ্ড.djvu/৬৯

DIGESTED INDEX IX. +. e VI. Bishwa Nāth Datta versus Durgāprasād Rāy and Shib Chandra Rāy. 4th July 1815. East's Notes, No. 84. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 75–79 28 If the reversioners supply or agree to supply the widow with maintenance, and mone for performance of such acts as are indispensable, she cannot alienate her husband’s property: if she do, such alienation is invalid. ... . . ... ... ... ... ... ... 61 Vide Macn. H. L. Vol. II. Ch. 8, case 4, p. 211. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 29 The widow's disposal of her husband's property otherwise than by the simple use of it, or by donation for the benefit of her lord, is invalid. ... ... ... ... ... ... 63 I. Rāmānanda Mukarjyá versus Rām Krishna Datta. S. C. Cons. H. L. pp. 19, 20. ... ... 85 II. Káli Kânta Lâhuri versus Golok Chandra Choudhuri. S. D. A. R. 80th October 1849. 87-91 III. Rám Chandra Sarmá versus Gangá Gobinda Bánarjyá. 1st February 1826. S. D. A. Rep. Vol. IV. p. 117. ... ... ... ... ... _... . • • . --- --- ... ... ... ... ...91-93 IV. Krishna Gobinda Sen versus Ladlimohun Thákur. 20th August 1819. S. D. A. Rep. Vol. II. p. 809. ... ... _ ... . ... _ ••• ... _ .-. . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 98 V. Bolāki Bibi versus Nanda Lál Bābu and others. S. D. A. Rep. 24th July 1854. ... ...93–97 VI. Mangalmani, mother of Kunjmohan Ráy, versus Kurán Chandra Dás, guardian of Rám Durlabh Dás. S. D. A Rep. 12tb September 1848. ... ... ... ... . . . . ... 91 VII. Gokul Chandra Chakrabattí versus Musst. Ráj Rání and Joy Gopál Choudhurí. 27th January 1816. S. D. A. Rep. Vol. II, p. 107. ... ... ... ... ... ..of ... ... 91 30 Should it happen that a widow is unable to maintain herself, or to dicharge the debts of her husband, or to perform those acts which are indispensable unless she sell the whole property inherited by her, she is allowed to do so by disposing of the whole, but she may dispose of only a moderate portion of the inheritance for performance of the optional religious acts. ... *... ... ... ... . . . . . 63 }I. Musst. Umá Choudhuráni and Gopi Náth Ráy τέλεια Indramani Choudhurání. S. D. A. Rep. 15th July 1847. * - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . . . II. Rám Chandra Sarmá versus Gangá Gobinda Bánarjyá. 1st February 1826. S. D. A. R. Vol. IV. p. 117. ... ... ... ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... ... ... ...91-93 31 The husband's heirs are entitled to interfere and prevent any wrongful alienation by the widow. This however is confined to the immediate heirs. ... ... ... ... 65 I. Hari Dás Datta mersus Rangan Mani Dási and others. S. C. 27th May 1851. Taylor's and Bell's Reports, Vol. II. part 5. ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... ... ... . . ...97–101 II. Poláki Bibi versus Nanda Lál Bābu and others. S. D. A. Rep. 24th July 1854. ... ...93–97 III. Hem Chând Majumdár versus Tárá Mani and others. 18th December 1811. S. D.A. Rep. 81 LLLLS LS LS 000S SSAS SSAS SSAS SSAS SSAS SSAS SSAS SSAS SSASAS SS SS 00 IV. Rám Dhan Bakshí and others versus Panchánan Bose and others. 20th July 1853. S. D. A. R. p. 641. 32 With the consent of the then next heirs, the widow may alienate the property inherit ed from her husband. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 65 1. Kali Chānd Datta versus John Moore and others. S. C. 20th March 1837. Fulton's Re 103 ports Vol. I. p. 78. SS SS S ST YYS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S C C C C C C C C C S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Káshí Náth Basák and Ramá Náth Bosák versus Hara Sundarí Dásí and Kamalmani Dásí. P. C. Clarke's Reports, pp. 91–101 - ... ... ... . . ... ... ... ... ... 131—183 Vide Srfmati Jádumani Debí versus Sh£rodfi Prasanna Mukarjyâ. S. C. 21 November, 1856. Englishman, 25th November 1846; and also the other cases in the Sections treating of sale and gift. 34. A gift or other alienation by a widow of a reasonable portion of the entire estate for the benefit of her deceased lord is valid, notwithstanding her husband's heirs did not consent thereto. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 65 I. Káshí Náth Basák & Ramá Náth Basák versus Hara Sundarí Dási & Kamulmani Dasí. 117-185 II. Rám Chandra Sarmá versus Gangá Gobinda Bánarjyá. 1st February 1826. S. D. A. Rep. Vol. IV. p. 117. ... _ ... .-. . ... _ ... ... ... ... ● 拳 挚 . ... 93 Vide Maen. H. I,. Vol. II. Case 87, (pp. 244, 245). 35 The widow is prohibited from making waste of her husband's personal as well as of his real property. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . . ... ... ... ... 65 Precedent Wyavasthá Vyawasthá Precedents 33 92 y? zy 2x Wyavasthá Precedents joy Vyavasthá Precedents 39 Vyavasthá Precedents Vyavasthá Precedents Wyavasthá