পাতা:ব্যবস্থা-দর্পণঃ প্রথম খণ্ড.djvu/৬৯৭

VY A V ASTHA"-JO ARPAN A. 575 R. Of the individuals above specified, that is, the widow's father and her husband's sister's son, the latter is her proper guardian in respect of her maintenance, and in the disposal of the property and care of herself, as, on her death, he is the successor to the property. This opinion is conformable to the Dooah/toya, Daoyukramasangraha, Joya(attra, and other authorities. Zillah Junglemehals; July 2nd 1822. Maen. H. L. Vol. II. Chap. VII. Case 3, p. 20 1 ;. 1. In the case of Karslıí Na'tlı Basák and Ranna Nath Basák rerxux Hara Sundarí IDa si and Kamal mami Dasi, it was ruled by the Supreme Court that Bishwa Nath Basāk, being at the time of his death, an infant under sixteen years, could not by the II indn law make a will, bequeathing his estate and property to the defendants after his death. Clarke's Notes of Decided Cases, p. 92. Cons. H. L. p. 83. II. In the case of Kalp Nath Singh rersus Kumlaopat Jha and others it was determined that an infant cannot execute a lease, nor enter into any other engagement. 21st May $. D. A. It. vol. II. p. 383. | S.2%), In the case of Ka shí Nath Basa k and Rama Nath Basa k cerens Hara Sundarí i »ása pe- e گم- = حیی is to - - 했 多* - and Kamal mani Das si', the mother of the infant widow Hara Sundari was appointed her guardian, and a competent monthly allowanee was ordered to be paid out of her husband's estate for her support during her infaney, Cous. II. L. p. 83. Wide Bishwa Nath Datta rersus Durga Prasad Dey and Shib Chandra Dey. [th July 1815. S. C. ( Sir Edward IIyle) Eust's Notos No. 8 4. Amte, pp. 75 -70. Pending a suit for partition by a widow, she adopted a son by the direction of her late husband; by the Hindu law the act of alloption diverted the property from the widow and vested it in the adopted son subject to the maintenance of the widow. Notwithstanding the acloption, however, the suit was prosecuted in the widow’s name, and a decree was made directing her to lov• pit, in possession. It was held by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, that, in such circumstances, she prosecuted the suit as guardian of the adopted son, and that she was entitled to possession as his trustee, and accountable to him for the profits of the property so decreed to her. Dharma Das Pánde and others rersus Shyamá Sundari Debio. 8th December 1843. Moore's Indian Appeals, vol. III. p. 229. Tho tat.}v cʼr esan 11ot tief as guartlī:uiı t ** ** *minor widow. while her husbi جون sister’s son” Îk living. איאא) ) loaring on the vvavastha, No. Ý3Ꭶ. ( erse” beitring on the vyavastha's No. 2-1 l & 2 #7. ( ' tse * :uring on the vyaviot has No. 's l. f ' tse ho aring on the v va v:ist, havos No. 252 & 253.