DIGESTED INDEX. XXXIX. Page 112 However, partition is not lawful while the mother lives 391 113 With the mother's consent the partition is lawful. 391 EXTENT OF EACH BROTHER'S SHARE. 114. The allotment of deductions has at present become impliedly obsolete 401 115 But even if there be a brother entitled to a deduction, he cannot compel his brother or brothers to give it to him. ... - - - - - - Ꮞ0Ꭵ 116 Deduction is never allowed among the Shādras. ... 403 117 lm the present age, the shares of the brothers are equal. ... * * * * - e. ... 405 I Bhoirab Chandra Rāy versus IRasamani. 18th September 1799. S. D. A. R. Wol. I. p. 27. 23 I'shwar Chandra Kárfaring and others versus Gobinda Chandra Kárfarmā and others S. C. Cons. H. L. pp. 74, 75.... ● 命 馨 & o * 制 鳕》 齡 疊尊 23 118 In a partition made between owrasa and dattaka sons, the own asa son has two shares, and the dattaka takes one share. ... 405 119 The grandson whose father is dead, and the great-grandson whose father and grandfather are dead, are respectively entitled to shares of their father and grandfather, and not to shares with reference to their own number - - - s a so ... 405 Jay Nārāyan Mallik and others versus Bishwambhar Mallik and others. S. C. Cons. H. L. pp. 48-50 ... ... ... ... ... -.. ... ... 415 120 If any of the brothers in whom the inheritance vested die leaving no son, grandsons and great-grandson, his other heir or heiress is entitled to his share. ... 409 Gadádhar Sarmá and Káli Dás Sarmá versus Ajodhyá Rám Choudhurí. 30th October 1794. S. D. A. R. Vol. I. p. 6. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 180–182 In the male line, the grandson whose father is dead, and the great grandson whose father and grand father are dead, share with the son, they inherit per stirpes, not per capaita.— Property having been given by a man to his four grandsons, and one of them dying, the son of the deceased is entitled to claim partition from his uncles.—One of three sons having separated himself, and taken a share during his father's life time, he has no further claim on the estate. But mere living apart does not exclude.—Sons share equally.—Property acquired by exclusive labour, without using the patrimony, goes to the acquirer solely. But property acquired by a father is on his death inherited equally by all his sons, whether they aided in the acquisition or not. Macm. H. L. vol. II: pp. 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 15, I50. 409-413 PARTITION OF THE Acquisition MADE By USING THE COMMON STOCK. 121 The acquirer has two shares of the property acquired by the use of the joint stock, the other parceners have one each. ... Gadádhar Sarmå and Käli Dás Sarma verente Ajodhyà Ràm Choudhurí, 30th October 1794. S. D. A. R. Vol. I. p. 6. exertions, he is not therefore entitled to a double share of the augmentation Guru Charan Dás and others versus Gokulmani Dási. S. C. Fulton's Reports Vol. I. pp. 165, 16Ğ. 4 s 5 - - • * * * - - - - - е в р 181—182 122 Should one member of an undivided family augment the joint stock by his sole 417 424) Vyavasthà
Vyavasthà 3.3 xy - ? t Precedent Vyavasthà Precedent Vyavasthà Precedent 97 V'yavasthà Precedent Vyavastlı& Precedent
