)
- ttf®if%
1 ) ) )
- r?nrl
c*t\ *re* gffa^ fa«fo **i \ *niw « ct^i «**, mPifa ?vc*t*« wt«rffa ( t cYfa- nos
- tTf*lf^ If: *ts
art* j t Goldstucl^ers Panini. P. ii vttttiv «tcy fwtsrc i («) ) ^fsnr star TfaTT35T, c’ft^rsl^r?? *rr$ ( is 3?*# «Tffo |
- tf®35 «tiwt
^¥atS**tf% <H^ ?TCv57 C’ttwsi ( id ) I «HCJt*tY cafafa* tYfa^nm src^i c*nw®1 ^firittiR ( vs>
- n$t-
•nil •ftftfac^ ^ -,
- faftaor?r
^tfsrfw 5(^55 cnfasrsi yc>r i t ( i<» 'sjqjtnY s i
- lfar®»
<2ffr5 Y5Ta??fa matf* ^urat ^fiisitsr ^f?-s 'srfjr^l f$zi5 <ttf* *1 1
- KTOc*r &
5HF? t «rrsnrt gsrt^ ips «f-QV? ^f?C5fa| <5f9|^ USf^fatS 'S#
- fa sfar® *nf*iftrY *i«r6(*cir* *s$ afagtcsst, afac^
- tTfa ^1
1 c*r aftfsjcBa, <®t*t ttstf* aifanc*! ^"•tlarc’t <5t?W ^tr?l
- ttf*l^fa 8
I % | \JHr, 8 1^1
- >«,<!»
J 8 | iS8 'S * I
- 4
gf^fe ^t3i ’gwafore fcfsfas sfatci i 8 I wrra? 5^«fatanr Hamilton Himself had analysed the syllogism more profoundly than Gotama. ( 7 3s ii ) Lassen’s Indische altertlmmskundc Yol I. 2d. ed. P. 864 and Webers Indische stud'en V. 136 ff. ( Last Results ofancient Sanskr it Literature ( i* ) P. 139-170 ( i'O ) Wilson, s Essays on sans. lit. Yol. I. Goldstucker.s Psmini P. 84—85. ( is ) it ) “ fasts C^liffa <-!&*«* Yi*ltfa fa# gfSfa l
“ grt’foKi
{ ” «f«ra «f'S* ^tts “ &fa
- —
XVIII. twta i ( yn ) Otto £oehtlink,s panini P. XIY is ) Yf$,*«rafafa Sd <2t3fa •'ttfafat &.
- >*> «3&1 142—
143.
