) ^tt® <«r%t® <af *5f*®1 f^T^ra <2fwi:*r«r ) " So ®f?fa s 'srtfmf® f?n i f W? ^JTt^ 4® <5^ <2i®T? ^flCtR ^CSR , fI f <r I f
fe®s <Rt?3 ^It3 faf«r® 'sttcf, <*k %%* &s?i f?r® ®tc® ’st^f® ®^® i
- r«ri
" f|sr®®j' <3t5Tf? #fac*i ” ( is> f<ro %*h i ^t®tst:®?T ^’rt 56 f*ifa® *tftw *rjt ’ths^ntsfl c® fafsrs f€tc® ^ ^®t«f
- P#®tc®r ®casr, ftsrtf® c*& ’prcs
’SRTf® ^f*m «rtfsp®, " 'srfatfifC’R *£&ffsr ^®t® 'suntfa tftsrff® ®Rtf® l ” ®t^R f^rrcs 2rt?f ssgHfai (*») ” ^te^t h®^ ®N«i stc^R <2Jtft=r ’srtcfnr f^c5i *rf£nrrc^ a, t*5t*rl ^®EI RH ®f%t®^T (
- tf^®^I >8C^*
(“*%) ’reretf^nrl «itfi^tf®?r
- i
) I ^’mstE'R ^f®Tt^T i ^bb®it ®N^ ®t®® ®ftf®st ^tfa® ^91 ®rc® i TNTiffalCSF® ^fsTTTl nlf® 'S
f*t® tfcfr
- ®
^®® 'srKmf®^ ®® f®®1 ®1 ®*r «r s i f%f®Ttt?® ( ®t® ®t*ft®3 wwt nt® <2ft®E"t $t?1®1 ®fert c^tfcr, ®*r <e ®tf**t- ®t®® i ®fs®®?t csf?:®n, c*R" ®TfC®® ®tE^l. ?®t<T 'SigotffR ®R® I ^i®® ®ft*- c®<r 'Sfl^rtl ^c® " «® ®?.f®®1i® ^sstfa®® -sr® «itcw i <ttt^tt*ra «ich*? ’ft® <2t*rfa c®E*r ®t*tt1®®t® fw** ^ca® srftw i ®«rt- iS> ) n (*.<>) « I 8 i Duncan's cntialsn on John Stuart Mill’s Subjection of Professor women. (,*.->) 4®«. ®®C® ®®E®tf®^f 9 tf31®tn ‘
ft®j?rtft$<ifS)®l w ®w f^*55^ ^ [ tf®Tf»T ’ «r?i^ " i«r 's (^) Weberns Modern investigations on ancient India p. 10 { ) M. Pictet’s £cs origincs Luld-Sarojpeemws Vol. i P. 51
