পাতা:মহারাজ রাজবল্লভ সেন ও তৎসমকালবর্ত্তী বাঙ্গলার ইতিহাসের স্থূল স্থূল বিবরণ.djvu/২৮৬

v of existence. The Taluq, at last, I think, ought to have been re-annexed to the Purgana, and made again to the assessment of it on the demise of the elder widow, for whose maintenance the revenue of it had been assigned, or, otherwise to have devoted to the surviving widows for their lives; for Pitambar Sen can have no inclusive right to it or to hold it on a rent-free tenure, by which the revenue for some years past has been subject to a double charge for the maintenance of the widows, and the other partners must continue subject to this double charge, if he be permitted to retain it. 8. The four partners, it appears, authorised the assignment of it to the surviving widows in the year 1196 B. S., when they were in possession of the one in Rajnagar, and are now desirous that both should be made over to them for their lives, including them however in the Butwara, in order to guard against disputes after their demise, regarding their right to the reversion of their respective shares, similar to that now subsisting between them relative to the Taluqs in Bozergomedpur, and which I recommend to be done as both reasonable and advisable. Pitambar Sen is the only partner who objects to give them possession of the Taluqs, and this objection is evidently to retain the one in Bozergomedpur, but the Board, I trust, will be enabled to determine from the information herein given, taking at the same time into consideration that he holds neither Patta nor other documents, for it, whether he had any just right to it, as also whether it is to be continued on a rent-free tenure, either in the event of its being confirmed to him, or determined the joint property of all the parties in equal shares. The Board were informed in my former letter upon the subject, that their Taluq was included in the attachment of the lands, claimed by Pitambar Sen, in the last year and it